Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

[[e-mail] (Henry S. Thompson)]

Graham Klyne writes:

> I've had private exchanges with one of the document editors, but I
> don't think my suggestions have been reflected in the current draft.
> In summary, what I think is not as clear as it should be in the scheme
> registration includes:
> * what does an acct URI identify
> * how are acct URIs allocated; what's the assignment delegation structure?
> * how should an acct: URI be dereferenced?  (e.g. if one were used as
> a link in a web page, how should it be handled?).

Hear, hear.  My primary reason for preferring a separate draft is/was
precisely that this would make the gaps in the current proposal more
obvious -- that is, make it clearer what was needed to assess the
acct: proposal _as a proposal in its own right_.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: [phone], e-mail: [e-mail]
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]