IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 09 July 2009 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA1F28C24D for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.133
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.133 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.404, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oM1KmCRkesCY for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575443A6809 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1MOxyV-000MzW-EJ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:04:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:04:02 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Subject: Re: httpbis vs yam meeting slots in Stockholm
Message-ID: <A9E3809AE5D93F28D69827D6@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4A561F0A.1030100@isode.com>
References: <4A52F11F.6000400@gmx.de> <59412B3595BB07DCFCFDC95E@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A561F0A.1030100@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:03:39 -0000

--On Thursday, July 09, 2009 17:47 +0100 Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

>> We should try and get this conflict fixed.
> 
> Can we swap httpbis with either:
>  Monday, 13:00-15:00 (idnabis)

Moving IDNABIS would set off a whole series of other problems
including, I believe, unavailability of the Chair.

FWIW, given the concerns about the content rules for URIs and
IRIs, a conflict between HTTPBIS and IDNABIS should also be on
the "must avoid" list.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email