[apps-discuss] status and name (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 14 November 2011 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB011E81C7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_RECV_IP_061228=0.895, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVDp3iywWP5t for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D00C11E8190 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (unknown [61.230.53.171]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E9BF4214E; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:00:01 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EC18DEB.6090003@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:53:47 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <20111024161910.8048.2279.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <p06240623cae622c69b08@[172.21.1.9]> <4EC0AD84.5060502@dcrocker.net> <p0624062acae67c872451@[172.21.1.9]> <4EC0D517.3030400@dcrocker.net> <p0624062fcae6925f6fe6@[172.21.1.9]> <4EC0F17B.5020003@dcrocker.net> <4EC0F1E7.7000602@stpeter.im> <4B9A1851-31B5-4147-A284-77A63664401C@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B9A1851-31B5-4147-A284-77A63664401C@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] status and name (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:53:51 -0000

On 11/14/11 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 14/11/2011, at 4:48 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/11 6:46 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>>
>>> Keep status separate from name.
>>
>> Exactly!
>
>
> +1

The same principle has emerged from discussions on the "Happy IANA" list 
(i.e., registration of parameters does not imply advancement along a 
standardization path). I sense a theme...

/psa