Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 03 June 2011 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96915E07EC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pB0+H+gK+5gR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58B4E0678 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEC3340046; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:22:14 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DE85364.6030900@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:22:12 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <321CAE57-EDC0-4DEE-801C-808FCBA36EF9@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <321CAE57-EDC0-4DEE-801C-808FCBA36EF9@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050101040604060700090808"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:22:16 -0000

On 6/2/11 9:13 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful-01>
> 
> Will this be progressing? I, for one, would like to see this as an BCP.

I'd be happy to bring it back to life, although I admit that I've mostly
forgotten about it and that I haven't yet addressed some of the feedback
I received last year. Also, I think "harmful" might be a bit strong --
"considered-useless" perhaps?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/