Re: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] quick review needed: draft-ietf-drprive-edns0-padding-02.txt
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E48C1B2DE6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.664
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TK_7ccVPQ9J0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76DF21B2DD3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26259 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2016 17:47:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2016 17:47:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:47:20 -0000
Message-ID: <20160202174720.68095.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <56B0A14E.7040101@cisco.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/dhupvlkSFOSGkNHEI4kGA4P0F4M>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] quick review needed: draft-ietf-drprive-edns0-padding-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:47:44 -0000
>Can I get a volunteer to review this draft? I have read through it and checked it against RFC 6891. It defines a new EDNS0 option that is ignored on receipt, to provide the ability to randomize the size and contents of DNS packets to deter traffic analysis. I don't see any problems with it. A DNS server is already supposed to ignore ENDS0 options it doesn't understand, so barring implmentation bugs it's unlikely to cause compatibility problems. R's, John