Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?
"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359733A6975 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQKHyx03MJDn for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2bthomr13.btconnect.com [213.123.20.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7E63A69F8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host217-44-202-158.range217-44.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([217.44.202.158]) by c2bthomr13.btconnect.com with SMTP id BHG63290; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:19:03 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <013a01cbb239$4a47f1a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73D79@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <AANLkTikfWyCy2GWJnxfwZM-bW3f=d_FbVB2smdRkO_im@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:15:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Neutral-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0301.4D2D8006.00DF, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr13.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.4D2D8018.013F, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:16:53 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com> To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Cc: <apps-discuss@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:47 PM Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Oh, and others have also found this slide-set, from a talk I gave at the Vancouver IETF, useful: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/70/slides/xmltut-0.pdf -Tim <tp> Yes, I endorse that. (especially where it says 'Use Plain Text If: ... you possibly can') I also found a series of 11 .pdf about XML Best Practices most helpful in identifying the choices a user of XML has to make, and some of the consequences. It is these choices I would have liked the IETF to be more pro-active about, back in 2006, but, as I said, there was no support for that. Tom Petch </tp> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I’ve got a project on the go that will result in a few different I-Ds for > consideration, one of which contains a specification for a new XML-based > reporting format. Can someone suggest some RFCs that have done a good job > of the same sort of thing in the past that I could use as a template for > such work, or a BCP or similar? > > > > Thanks, > > -MSK > > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss > > _______________________________________________ apps-discuss mailing list apps-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
- [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Anthony Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tony Finch
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Tim Bray
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer? Ladislav Lhotka