IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis: PS or DS?

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 02 September 2011 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E8D21F8D3A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.024
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.024 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYBWwrQ5+g+O for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D74221F8D32 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so2967543gxk.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iWHoHmiur3R5QApo8WTAdqZJKz63eQFfkuCDZx1FgwU=; b=KF6XzeCVtAYLv3QbRVp28C7m7KmHKq/MdcUQYDUPeadNTAuLsENFBValNeZbK6QmGG MOVZbdLBSs1QXHuXrUzy0IOufkqmSYCnF2j/3aYexAQ3GPoOVWY8zCyTrlkIZhjsrVeh GR0r8E4fJH2PpJ0I029V/sA52fmQwByoqTEGo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.75.165 with SMTP id z25mr7962198yhd.68.1314995772767; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.40.6 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFA7F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFA7F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:36:12 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d_G7-_V2kBa_paAgaCODOs9kytM
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBfyO4qDKEQp+0tsiN65oyUAvAdFs1-y5v3r1q7o+Ve4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis: PS or DS?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:34:38 -0000

> RFC3462 is currently DS.  There's some question as to whether or not
> this revision qualifies to remain at DS, or forces a recycle at PS.

Chair comment:
The decision about the ultimate status of the document will be made by
the IESG, but input from the working group is important.  I'd like to
hear from people either way: if you think this change is acceptable to
make in a Draft Standard document, please say; if you think this
change requires us to move the document back to Proposed Standard,
please say.  If you think we can't decide this without more
discussion, testing, research, or whatever, please say that as well,
and specify what you think needs to be done.

Barry, document shepherd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email