[apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (2966)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 10 September 2011 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7CC21F86B3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hiYi5XgHSbmJ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B48D21F86A4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7D45098C251; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, john+ietf@jck.com, presnick@qualcomm.com, stpeter@stpeter.im, barryleiba@computer.org, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, yaojk@cnnic.cn
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110910083446.7D45098C251@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:34:46 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:27:41 -0700
Cc: bortzmeyer+rfc@nic.fr, apps-discuss@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (2966)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:32:49 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6365,
"Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6365&eid=2966

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+rfc@nic.fr>

Section: 2

Original Text
-------------
Malay is primarily written in
      Latin script today, but the earlier, Arabic-script-based, Jawa
      form is still in use

Corrected Text
--------------
Malay is primarily written in
      Latin script today, but the earlier, Arabic-script-based, Jawi
      form is still in use

Notes
-----
I don't know this script myself but it seems that, in english, it is always called Jawi (Jawa is the old name for the island it came from, so Jawi = script from Jawa).

This script (actually a variant of the arabic one) does not seem to be in ISO 15924 so I cannot offer an authoritative reference.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6365 (draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
Publication Date    : September 2011
Author(s)           : P. Hoffman, J. Klensin
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Applications Area Working Group
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG