Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 14 January 2012 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBA021F84D4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:15:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.813, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALjIDbScPr7j for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D3EF221F84AA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2012 17:15:39 -0000
Received: from p3EE27592.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [62.226.117.146] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 14 Jan 2012 18:15:39 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+lKvkUlr2lBpjkXemFDz6EcpTnJO1aBhg3ixTl7h +axDmIsDyj00wJ
Message-ID: <4F11B832.1040205@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:15:30 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
References: <20120114105523.32324.64307.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F116C45.2060605@gmx.de> <8i53h715g9kjghtgqhsjqvb4mdnelqaqa0@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <4F119EFE.7040106@gmx.de> <qt73h7p28jvcc91at1r4n8c8cpdsetjfod@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <4F11A526.6020909@gmx.de> <1j93h7du1f85o4egf685k1g8upm4j9fsn4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <1j93h7du1f85o4egf685k1g8upm4j9fsn4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] informal Last Call on draft-reschke-http-status-308-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:15:41 -0000

On 2012-01-14 17:51, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> ...
>>>> - why do I need to specify encoding? It's all US-ASCII
>>>
>>> Because RFC 2854 says it's strongly recommended to use the parameter.
>>
>> Well, it's a silly recommendation in this case. And it's NOT UPPERCASE!
>
> If you really want to argue that the example is better when it does not
> declare the character encoding without very clearly indicating that the
> declaration has been elided because it's "all US-ASCII" ... Do you still

I think it doesn't matter at all; but I'll change it.

> keep Internet Explorer 6 around? It should be possible to make an ex-
> ample that does not redirect to where you think it would, but I would
> have to set up a virtual machine for testing and there kinda would be no
> point if you don't have the right browser to try it.

Could you elaborate about what this has to do with IE6?

Best regards, Julian