IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-kerwin-file-scheme and hosts

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Sat, 10 January 2015 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B5B1A1A5E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fDoVYLP0cKe for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22c.google.com (mail-qa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1131A1A72 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w8so3813843qac.3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EomcV1nG0JRcyalBDPuemwzWDRD2ZZyhnwKkZ0pHXv0=; b=UB2euLMvJ4V5vgQUEHHY625GMCPiBaVpi0I1iQB8w1BYComS7FkAcy+B887oSOmwyP x0BiPaAKrS3IXuc0jxkLcnANCT10QaS5WemNu9JMM5ea9dQpV3OttfGfVbW/F0xXYFaA bv5gqSgA+WY8mOy0DjJa5ZHjVk9P457WvtpGGb2j9HpR0GY3KL9IhM5o8eJfr2wM+yQD wy9RM1LFAmWwbK0Tl2nEoWbBPviIRiXzd2Ew5GjFs53S61lVJ46VOoyOs005DRmKvx0D rqyfSns9SCIreoxKf54bNiTrqbs5B+p8aNYgXwtdSVAMyMw16EC6RrmHjlK5kSuaDRhn dx/g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.130.65 with SMTP id r1mr38724428qcs.16.1420933119540; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.93.98 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:38:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54B19221.2080203@intertwingly.net>
References: <CAL0qLwYrAGk-gpfMKigy8C8CCzdA4NhQv60UdUmBtXdkQF10SA@mail.gmail.com> <54922C81.4030908@intertwingly.net> <CACweHNDT4iNmDyGkvDBa08apPcaQC7hoAQ2gFZxYE-8wFiDrvg@mail.gmail.com> <5494C6AF.4070902@intertwingly.net> <CACweHNB04C8a2NefHnx0wxZSRw7KOyBzPPuuniEi=uvgQ5M5pg@mail.gmail.com> <2e33balagh0scqtgaf87vh48vc8l9jm7g7@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <54B19221.2080203@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 09:38:39 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4x0TKXVa3ATWw_ItZTJRe6p2moc
Message-ID: <CACweHNAhkj0BhhYixdfai1az6Gu3J3pZpeQ8Vsu7rAMN1keJTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133d79ad705ef050c54c5cc"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/eKdyfV3WIH1vLlsNBDqmKSL_n7k>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-kerwin-file-scheme and hosts
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:38:46 -0000

On 11 January 2015 at 06:57, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> [never saw Matthew's reply.  still can't find it.  weird]
>
> On 01/10/2015 03:40 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
>> * Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 December 2014 at 10:45, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>  file://[2001::1]/foo
>>>>
>>>
>>> I thought this already worked with RFC 3986..? See the "IP-literal"
>>> construct in <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2>, which
>>> is
>>> used in "host".
>>>
>>
> My point was that it works with RFC 3986, but doesn't work with
> draft-kerwin-file-scheme.  I encourage you to look at section 2.2 of RFC
> 4291.
> ​
> ​
> ​
>
>
>
How does it not work? Consider that I may not be an IPv6 guru, and possibly
[2001::1] means something to you that it doesn't to me.



>
> ​​
> There is a very simple fix for this.  I believe that what you want to
> refer to instead is section 2 of RFC 6874.
>
>
It says "...and importing the "userinfo", "host", "path-absolute", and
"query" rules from [RFC3986] (as updated by [RFC6874].)"



-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status