Re: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] Fwd: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 02 May 2013 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3200821F8D29; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qha1eId8s4b2; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D3721F8D0D; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq12so100207wib.3 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 May 2013 13:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bYg6sAu59InJ6FBOrFPc2w7FzSdkRnBWrAQtXFUvsY4=; b=V6+NNQy9SZ7upLOp5juKuA0YHSpIubsXeReVJXf0XpGGaHhRcAETjHBtoZtjOIZcNE onui89fqyx3M670OGqv3h15YoL6fhNshgdrEURvfFIyAKKHasZbiIPhpURrkh+BSAV/a i8Oanjm5XkrjvjM5/OUZ1cMiTSDHfKdapj6NzWXpC+DrgxwmX0YHzwfoRE1yo1ItGWPE TIlCsAI/bgGygbAcyj6IIJnnCV52pU0V+Clkaoou1hX955Jdxe/jzb5wFA7FaKWAuO27 Fn1LDqr6jhYD4+pGJL1uBgNf4dVSQEEnC3iJU8yFa4VWkJ+Xv60TEBcfH018+FHqFiWR TiPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.83.199 with SMTP id s7mr9931501wiy.19.1367526526427; Thu, 02 May 2013 13:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 13:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130502074157.GA4935@elstar.local>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428233426.0b62fed0@elandnews.com> <20130430083206.GD46852@elstar.local> <CABkgnnUe=9RsND+30y3kK39AjvEHe4KKV2qsj=ZkqCAXf0GPHA@mail.gmail.com> <20130502074157.GA4935@elstar.local>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 13:28:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUDbCt775Bk2tdQZvwUruKdkC-K+dS34q1mxG1=tP8X+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] Fwd: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 20:28:48 -0000

On 2 May 2013 00:41, Juergen Schoenwaelder
<j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:29:02PM -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> One meta-comment.  I don't consider the contents of RFC 6021 to have
>> any bearing on the review of this document.  I'm not familiar with
>> 6021, so I consider all of this to be new.
>
> But most of the definitions are not new and I am reluctant to make
> changes to published RFC text.

I thought that was the purpose of revising an RFC.  If you were just
looking to add types, an update might be more appropriate.

> If you mean by "second" the ipv6-address-no-zone typedef, please see
> my response to Joel. This is a type derived from ipv6-address.

Ahh, both patterns apply.  My mistake; I had assumed OR (like XML
schema), not AND.  Interesting approach.