[apps-discuss] draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB58111E820E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-3CIfk3Mbs6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39BF11E8166 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 12so1388677wgh.3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kyLZn6yUVQEEjWhtqQT1ara+/YjGqyVW/1yWp0MNCnk=; b=wcIZFg4c3FthI1F8H7ur99vIMYTpp/KOUsnxrM+9GcxvUcDbNts69qoDj3Nu8W6d0b z24iIQxdgWHf1TYCODaiNhM6aDpPhmXd2TZFoLSvjdEJmk0QpyH7ZiktYPAk687g+dnv r9fjnaF/QoBvxURuspUJ7+f9eaFwcBjgOES6rhyIe0xTjskVThhGqYAK/5c5KXE4qQJm JOjMb8CfS4PDle3S8urOlj15p+foRM+02Vh2g3EQo2bCv/iAJ/OBn6YaT5bXJN1VhJ1O BaI77CYqy8W697GyXRjZXTnSsclGtctoDrGGoCU6ept2+0luIP9Bk6u7sgQpCOYlG+fP ktpQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id wr3mr6597634wjc.35.1363290006171; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:40:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbgjnt8Msofok3ExKBmChtQPfMEFgrrZBimEzU5CYgSjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d1da88b395b04d7e7b050"
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:40:07 -0000

I've uploaded an update to draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis for review.  It
incorporates the feedback I've received over the last few months since the
last version.


To recap: RFC5451 defines a standard message header field for recording the
results of things like DKIM and SPF by border MTAs so internal things like
MUAs don't have to repeat those checks.  This is an update draft based on
operational experience since the proposed standard was originally published
in 2009.

So, two things:

1) Reviewers, please!  I think this is pretty much ready to go as it's been
around since last June with some reviews, but nothing lately.  A final
glance by some of the apps community (especially mail people) would be

2) I'd like to process this through APPSAWG.  Salvatore would have to
shepherd it since I can't shepherd my own document.  Is that a reasonable
path for this work?  There isn't an active working group doing SMTP things,
and we know our ADs would prefer to avoid sponsoring things if possible.

-MSK, participatorially