IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG charter for "arf" (Abuse Report Format)

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 10 July 2009 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23EB28C25F for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjWu1vNGccpJ for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695F828C205 for <discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ppp-68-120-199-146.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.120.199.146]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6AFvHCm032499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:23 -0700
Message-ID: <4A5764DD.30404@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:17 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed WG charter for "arf" (Abuse Report Format)
References: <BB012BD379D7B046ABE1472D8093C61C0112AA8C82@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4A55F884.6070703@cisco.com> <BB012BD379D7B046ABE1472D8093C61C0112AA8DE1@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB012BD379D7B046ABE1472D8093C61C0112AA8DE1@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "discuss@ietf.org" <discuss@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:57:17 -0000

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
> 
> The MAAWG conference in Amsterdam showed that there are a few deployed
> enhancements not already covered by the current draft, and a few others
> people are interested in discussing. 


The current draft lists exactly one item from this set.  It would probably help 
to list others.

The goal is to increase the risk of failure...


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email