Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Wed, 04 April 2012 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08E111E8122; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.835
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.236, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qJugEg33CWX; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B80511E811E; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 72ccc7f4.0.1362671.00-404.3787430.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:33:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 4f7ccc28596645c1-c70c0a286e1ef63a8c40952db801a3ce74cbd015
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q34MXBAF012821; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:33:11 -0400
Received: from sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (sflint01.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.228]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q34MX7fR012796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:33:08 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:32:42 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q34MWgBK000912; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:32:42 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q34MWeUY000801; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:32:40 -0400
Received: from [135.70.246.76] (vpn-135-70-246-76.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.246.76]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120404222945gw1004oruve> (Authid: tony); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:29:45 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.246.76]
Message-ID: <4F7CCC06.7030503@att.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:32:38 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C8BC0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F7C4851.4070405@att.com> <4F7C5471.8030309@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F7C5471.8030309@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=lfzeU_yUqTgA:10 a=vnNYxAp2wzwA:10 a=nqx3OqInfd]
X-AnalysisOut: [IA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:1]
X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=zQP7CpK]
X-AnalysisOut: [OAAAA:8 a=U0dKssfmjYBsul6zYL0A:9 a=burmj3Rp3i3EbdaRMHwA:7 ]
X-AnalysisOut: [a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=Hz7IrDYlS0cA:10]
Cc: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:33:12 -0000

On 4/4/2012 10:02 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> The latter naming template convention (+xml) is well-established.
>
> Even if an equivalent convention has not yet been established for 
> json, it makes sense to reapply the model for naming json-based 
> media-types.

Although draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs both mentions the use of 
+json and defines a registry that can be used to register it, and 
despite +json being used already in a variety of registered media types, 
+json hasn't been formally defined yet.

So, I posted draft-hansen-media-type-suffix-regs-00 for consideration to 
fill in this hole.

Discussion of the draft should occur on the APPS AWG mailing list 
<apps-discuss@ietf.org>rg>.

     Tony Hansen
     tony@att.com