Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

[Julian Mehnle <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba wrote:

> That means that what you want to say is that the working group is, at
> this charter stage, documenting the *existing*, widely implemented
> protocol, which has sufficiently broad, interoperable deployment to be
> on Standards Track.  Say that there are suggestions for changes that
> are not part of the current widespread implementation, some of which
> are not backward compatible, and that *all* these changes (whether
> backward compatible or not) could be in scope for a future recharter
> or new working group, but are not in scope here.

Yes, *please* let's avoid any slippery slopes, lest this effort goes down 
the drain.

-Julian