[apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List
Walter <walter.stanish@gmail.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 15:31 UTC
Return-Path: <walter.stanish@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F26821E81E1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:31:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-4p6T897DmN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93221E8163 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com with SMTP id eh20so1036821obb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of walter.stanish@gmail.com designates 10.182.188.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.188.36;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of walter.stanish@gmail.com designates 10.182.188.36 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=walter.stanish@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=walter.stanish@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.188.36]) by 10.182.188.36 with SMTP id fx4mr2226931obc.7.1330615879108 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=18Ijw13mq0xPzbZtDDNBDqtCdob50/P9KLiqO0fGauU=; b=eV21kj70wtPxV1726ZlX+35UyH3dFICGcHry5z7k6mMUSp7MtSTez45HRAaA/dMll4 OJcx8JdrsVzoYtdiJFJT5iPie1+i6b+KwZUglN5CMEyfx8DEQjEZNKQ0h5QIFyAo0lFJ PHIfhVk153e1G7TBH7AzSLpCYOeFMWisgK3LY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.188.36 with SMTP id fx4mr1929712obc.7.1330615879044; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.15.232 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:31:19 +0700
Message-ID: <CACwuEiOPeym2Ro6WffhAg__nzkiKmBXu7woKV3kWLodX11b1Qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Walter <walter.stanish@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:32:21 -0000
Hi there. This message is posted at the request of the Application Area Managers as the culmination of email interaction dating back to December 15, 2011. We seek the establishment of a mailing list for the discussion of financial area protocols. Recently Payward Inc. authored two drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iiban/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-imic/ The drafts propose means for financial endpoint identification and financial market identification. They are of wide potential interest for alternate financial networking, however they are missing a critical and complex reason to deploy them widely, which is an inter-institutional protocol for transaction quotation, negotiation, reporting and state management. A possible solution in this area will be presented in an upcoming draft, essentially seeking to provide a mechanism to replace established protocols (ISO20022, FIX) with an open, non-legacy alternative with adequate flexibility to support emerging digital financial networks. To illustrate, the problem statement for the as yet unpublished draft is as follows. ============================================================ Certain functionality required by modern financial systems is not presently available in open, legacy-free, adequately globalized protocols. This functionality includes: * Settlement and reversal / cancellation term negotiation * Exchange rate negotiation * Latency calculation / negotiation * Fee, tax and discount calculation / negotiation * Arbitrary currency / asset support * Multi-currency / asset transaction support * Quotation support * Multiple settlement path support * Optional support for in-band settlement (sometimes known as DVP) * High precision decimal value support * Arbitrary financial settlement topology support * Arbitrary communications topology support Given this situation, it makes sense to propose a legacy-free, adequately extensible protocol for internet-based financial exchange. ============================================================ In addition to our own work above, most of you are probably aware of some of the various other efforts going on in the financial world. These efforts include mobile finance, digital currencies and settlement systems, private currency markets, new transaction protocols, scalable non fiat-currency based community-centric transaction systems, and other projects. A few examples: - Bitcoin: http://bitcoin.org/ - CES: http://ces.org.za/ - Ripple: http://ripple-project.org/ - W3C Web Payments: http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/ At this stage some discussions have already occurred in public forums with reference to the drafts that Payward Inc. has published and the potential for a greater community involvement in exploring potential solutions: http://bit.ly/v6n2tk (The Bitcoin Trader) http://bit.ly/xpMxQ3 (Bitcoin Development list) http://bit.ly/zpVHms (Ripple Users) Unfortunately, due to the project-oriented nature of each of these forums it is difficult to focus on issues that exceed individual project scope either affect or have the potential to affect the wider internet community. Therefore Iwebelieve that it would be useful to try to draw representatives of the various projects together to discuss such issues via a mailing list hosted at the IETF, with the goal to discuss and develop solutions to problems in established and emerging financial networks. The IETF specifically can provide: 1. Transparency and community examination of a proven standards development process 2. Access to IANA: an established, internationally credible third party for registry management (very useful to build trust in alternate financial systems) 3. Access to functional, supplementary services such as document distribution. We therefore request the establishment of a financial area mailing list. Feedback and statements of interest are hereby requested. Regards, Walter Stanish Payward Inc.
- [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailin… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Ted Hardie
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… =JeffH
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… John Levine
- [apps-discuss] Running code ... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… =JeffH
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Carsten Bormann
- [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: Propo… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: P… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: P… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)