IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 19 September 2012 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6EC21F84AE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDX93Op2NvCO for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EE121E8034 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weyx48 with SMTP id x48so945138wey.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mIVq4gwsKF9ZsQaD2yAC6KiVfE8Sg98u5+//muL5KMs=; b=tCCkOttvuWziDVSm0XzcCpTbxRV2UfBjEQkkKXyx8vQHHsRop6qzakxpCfI9nCq7KD sf+Yj+jy+Pv0hJPMl7AN6i1drQM4Ydy7U19D5KZUz5RgXcupQbGTVB+9wgdqHpf01Nan tKxlVpc3ZzV/hkvZP+zGepjIPg/o5iIdIlucgsieqaN4cOYcwLljo2Y1WS4OIB5gJj2A iGCVQVlpgL5EGTeX4wMdQdt+IrSXpMSjCBvrgKj7YbwP64O5+w/ngpXINVIHj4oKNj8Z dfiRfeXwuIudH+Rmk1JgLmGfLu9UtpGmU8eWvJFBbKwdSdHjgoKunkFu8zPv7i1pVd3S Ku2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.194.143 with SMTP id m15mr2460605wen.128.1348093054916; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.182.4 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.182.4 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOgxaUvMOHDemXbThECsOvAgfkUhttiTwmuyNDe533Ywtg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwjYj0gd3Cxjj8WFcLy-zgBwfVDCPaRGcNSgOHD9m_07yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBCqAMLi8v61u1+oPpHaMpHrK4ufUm6fUUyMb8XMmz8JSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiyohqhRA+m3M0ViSkt74q3yOfUkZj8b-upc4V_qUv22g@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBCBScuO797yBmY3c_wRUa98=DYwN2rXXbq41pE2GHK4vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgQLc8v+V7JhEr4zEw37e0ovrUkFy0RZKOszg1FbkMjeA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBDkOOfWq-qzR-6mtU8TULcp4BfS0h=WRKJZDSh+G8M9zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgNZuLYvyhayA2JQtH36e05HJWbdkKUt6yei10p5p-XRA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBAwYPGep4QMGK1Bx0SSmB=yTXRbjH9VGPZ0MKHcQzr_Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgJRAK6k_xp1Zky84owtWDD7m7ptZJpFsGwe80ikVmQBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALcybBA0TqoO6Xdf02wM6=6HJeGokRVdxOQ2_SUmVBqxtNZOCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOgxaUvMOHDemXbThECsOvAgfkUhttiTwmuyNDe533Ywtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:17:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbe5fKDSh9eke=Ems+HBTRurxKvD-cpXB4StG6XCYErC6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6da2e7fa9984304ca155f1b"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Schema considered harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:17:36 -0000

+1 ... as much as I would hate to jump into the middle of this pissing
match, let's not forget that IDs are not finished products. If there have
been incremental updates to the spec since it was last published, please
post the update so it can be properly reviewed.... even if its not yet done.
On Sep 19, 2012 3:11 PM, "Nico Williams" <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > And you'd have remembered, also, that I _explicitly said_ that they
> > were not submitted yet because feedback was needed.
>
> Well, we submit Internet-Drafts because feedback is needed :)  It's
> quite OK to submit a badly incomplete/unfinished I-D; indeed, I'd say
> that that's the only way to get started and make progress towards a
> Standards-Track RFC.
>
> Nico
> --
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email