IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E2721F8C0C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5+D7HLpKHEJr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFDD21F8BF9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:44:59 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:44:57 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
Thread-Index: Acx9CjQ6huSPXQRwSDmfrPe+qJGExAAQ4qhg
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C45D9D30@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110922053351.2337.12758.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><4E805282.5050004@isode.com> <01O6I5IVA4F2014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <4E80DA9E.6000101@isode.com> <013901cc7d01$214dfc20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <013901cc7d01$214dfc20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:42:14 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t.petch
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:35 AM
> To: Alexey Melnikov; Ned Freed
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
> 
> > >> 5. Registering New Report Types
> > >
> > >>     Registration of new media types for the purpose of creating a new
> > >>     report format SHOULD note in the Intended Usage section of the media
> > >>     type registration that the type being registered is suitable for use
> > >>     as a report-type in the context of this specification.
> > >
> Surely it should say
> 
> "Registration of new media types for the purpose of creating a new
> report format SHOULD note in the Intended Usage section of the media
> type registration **whether or not
> the type being registered is suitable for use
> as a report-type in the context of this specification."
> 
> As the text stands, it merely says that all new media types are suitable,
> which seems rather pointless:-)

I don't agree.  I think the first line of the new Section 5 makes it clear that some are (the ones being registered specifically for that purpose), and some aren't (the rest).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email