[apps-discuss] application or ops (service template)

"Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <haibin.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F2E21F9C13 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GomXWD68GKmM for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F73D21F9B8D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ATW64193; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:56:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:56:32 +0100
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:56:37 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:56:32 +0800
From: "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: application or ops (service template)
Thread-Index: Ac6L/end3oh5MSjlQjiEfZqG9hjWVw==
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:56:31 +0000
Message-ID: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2471A80B@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.216.45.192]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F2471A80Bnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [apps-discuss] application or ops (service template)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:56:50 -0000

Hi guys,

I'm not sure about the exact scope of applications area or the OPS area. IMHO, the OPS area is mainly about the network configuration, network diagnostics, tests and network deployment considerations. I personally see a pure software installation on which components to install, where there are not much interactions with the network layer, is a pure application layer thing. But I would like to learn more on other opinions.

BR,
-Haibin