Re: [apps-discuss] Experimental (was - Re: Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme)

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Thu, 14 April 2016 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F06112DD6D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 03:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHck7wA1uIAT for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 03:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C584512DD26 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 03:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.206]) by relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1aqeOD-0003cb-bY; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:20:45 +0100
Received: from modemcable171.142-37-24.static.videotron.ca ([24.37.142.171] helo=[192.168.55.103]) by smtp6.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1aqeOD-0001dZ-KK; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:20:45 +0100
Message-ID: <570F6EFB.9050209@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:20:43 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <20160413200825.15190.qmail@ary.lan> <14F6E2A0-8F9A-4855-9DA3-BBA383196790@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <14F6E2A0-8F9A-4855-9DA3-BBA383196790@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/hfh9QVmuoSBeN07r2O0jbp53Kz8>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Experimental (was - Re: Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:21:01 -0000

On 14/04/2016 01:02, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Is there a test suite or other data to validate the decisions made?

Not specifically that I know of, but there are test suites for URIs in general 
that describe resolution behaviours that file:// URIs should conform to by 
virtue of following rules set out by RFC3986.

#g
--