[apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917CB21F90B3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tk6W7q4KSirk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC8721F9057 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u54so1161720wes.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hyHjjnlWRYW1zOtkXcl0fyrVoaRJSxUU/FqVrb8RVtw=; b=OB1TvKQPQRgMd8KDs4LobonS4wpJAfjdRmpVQY2xqSEPqwF0OEi5TPh3cMUhcp97X2 DnPibYGMrer5I709H72+PwR2mldR7bzQC8LpjkPAP8Gn5ozdcPFSDjdXf3iDoPtPsWEt IeRelFz/DTFwK56lQPlB0oGzBDOk8y2lKla14tyae1XvWuM1mPGidMuALmAKn0cPKiKt wNY7vOjwwif3RkJ2h5TpPDMF/pBdMOAtTJ1hiuatU5NDyhzyZXRXNsJukSd7ScmoAE9n jvuEveiDnWGRG9XZpESJ+++Ca5FApvVnUOHsEECFTQ82JsnmhgpWbbWypSO4qHqQZqBy KNDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id et4mr6257232wjd.59.1367965470866; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:24:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04ad8f4c1aa04dc284783"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:24:39 -0000

We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document and
appears to fall within our charter.

We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?

Alternatively, the ADs may wish to spin up another short-lived WG to handle
this.  Barry or Pete, care to comment?

-MSK, co-chairin'