Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA03121F85FF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyZ2C36T-U2A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm35-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DB64221F85F7 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm35.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2012 20:06:42 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.7] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2012 20:06:42 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2012 20:06:42 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 456643.58996.bm@omp1007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 37753 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Jun 2012 20:06:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1340741202; bh=Oz40qb/AM/NJVRL6T6aRgk5Mt8AcrDwcPa8hPBx8SGU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TTMUWgxvXroiAy+xjzLV7QYj+XyyFMqRSi8+QkYXfq0dc6j7sbDW+1OWcib/FuffkaZ2DlTftvbd14CWMjv1MnqwKwO5m2XId+CgG5IRkKbTcABqqI12imFiCY4CAPJRQm3fFxdg4j4u+lXaKAhIjptXyzJ6SzXD1BV1meb1f9g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kDld0sL9B9dGMSsHyy7gGGGhx/oBayaLN/74NkU+Bb9KonqBcSIaKv7yusnlE64xxqL8rODOny5LbSUZTADhcoS421f3Fy3pHEkE9pzZ7DVaqmSYu8U7WuXsPkLqsObgD7gfjDjN87RoR4WqpIbPcf0Z7C9P6cC1Sjxuqvre9Ig=;
X-YMail-OSG: rhS8zxYVM1lw9Q4uwL0QMwthqIMNLtPuCJh0OJt0ezHtSnK D1GzOBGV0u.wcFwflTUVL593OEEvcl77RHFBT01pUT.vGNZYXpsV557xB1Fh 26qUElmkZ8XU9r2Zd9nG8fuxgB7luBrJAH4V7QUm0aP57m32PMyY9Xt6glYO fxFDCaMoZ66vF8Mh05ecEHEaSZW7BJqzJzNF_pmGaaiwcXGw2gufYg6iifph 3AxoAXvdvNd7vb0_CKFkb9g68UwGcJg4p6GhIbcG4NIZVbW8aYBQRj9ouymt HLIO5NJY8flYCEv0aBK5AEBz2BZUOwtCTX6H9PjAQqUGUKWChykJtghGAac6 JfEhDLO8tklXSkuQmEiaVm6o.cO4m9llUh8G4NBBc_vzI546qDPFxsvDTIs_ 5Q1VK_HkRBOrlllBmOqkFRLzGDLzdVH3w7IkbR5BiqMbeE6JR_w0-
Received: from [209.131.62.120] by web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:41 PDT
X-RocketYMMF: william_john_mills
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAKaEYhKpeayOw4sN4=NYaoXKJQ2e5P+pP8SqJqnt-=Barb=WqA@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366568E4F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <f5bhatyqdfb.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <1340741201.99354.YahooMailNeo@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:06:41 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <f5bhatyqdfb.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:06:43 -0000


I note that Paul's message there dated June 15th has generated no traffic in reply yet.



>________________________________
> From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
>To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> 
>Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com> 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:51 AM
>Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
> 
>Mike Jones writes:
>
>> Yes, I believe that the acct: scheme should be considered separately
>> from discovery, in its own document.
>
>Yes, please.  Discussion on uri-review@ietf.org will be much more
>focussed and appropriate given a specific self-contained uri-scheme
>proposal to consider.  I for one have been standing back from this
>discussion lately because I can no longer tell exactly what is part of
>the acct: scheme and what isn't -- a separate document will, I hope,
>clarify that.
>
>ht
>-- 
>       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
>      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
>_______________________________________________
>apps-discuss mailing list
>apps-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
>