IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 05 August 2016 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6759F12D1AE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9bJCbf-2G5z for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D967212B05B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.4.10.156] (unknown [IPv6:2001:984:aee9:104:7496:35ef:21df:a6a8]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF0C620344; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 06:09:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 06:09:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CD1BDF58-12D7-4FBF-A4B0-F7E9F0348263@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <d883251c-8bfb-9e96-4e5b-2e76960064e4@dcrocker.net>
References: <40c227db-76ff-15bd-3358-ba85a63f1b59@gmail.com> <08FD5E91-BB1B-4190-AD00-5BE6505556D6@frobbit.se> <d883251c-8bfb-9e96-4e5b-2e76960064e4@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_DEC6C2BF-E073-4D4E-AE55-E577542C6817_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6042)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/j10EqNPf5T6YtbPFzecsKKE-vPk>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 04:09:42 -0000

On 4 Aug 2016, at 0:20, Dave Crocker wrote:

> So finding a way to simplify this down to one table seems eminently reasonable.

I think this is a very good goal, reachable, and NOT succeeding is something we should not decide upon lightly.

   paf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email