[apps-discuss] URI Template: how is the erratum progressing? And another question

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Thu, 23 May 2013 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2551921F9128 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLUJjocfxN40 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6C321F97DA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d4so2056464eek.0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vgRQR9klgaZXQz5FIkVd43GY/wQEVM/XLBI3MlxH5QY=; b=dR9AbkUdcOgJ15fRPp6E53MQIlNQsmNUOC19h7fV8dDTjrwOSobrfL3mf3EthoMlNH BSz6zJCb8QciTFO2ohmMyyu6nag4OsKqfAQZGYz3nyLo3Z+UHRkdh6BnDpbV5Pxb9pRS Y90b2Wo9tgdhpdo8tTamrwVN2VSh8AT60u3qh0TT4MJFbBUKW05HMKR/BPUEciE99vt3 e4803YujuaDHTIslIFzGnLUxw4kUvPBLBRUIbEhDCBeQ2khBvqWhi89v8Hw+vYsHFr80 KbyE9HvTk74KGGK2epVj+ltZlUHrqqr3eHXZ48r/iFCbAuVsPSV7K80KbBLaQ0wfLgNL iHPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.15.34.206 with SMTP id e54mr23634983eev.24.1369328389023; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.15.55.136 with HTTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 09:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:59:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CALcybBAKi3w=tP7-3JqhXBb-W5uDgm6s7F7StYe8=FJM9UbLFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [apps-discuss] URI Template: how is the erratum progressing? And another question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:12:10 -0000

Hello,

So, the first question, as to the erratum, is related to the points I
raised some times ago about how to handle empty arrays/associative
arrays. I'd like to know the progress on that front.

Another question is about handling empty _keys_ in an associative
array. Is this legal at all? Empty values are allowed, they obviously
have a use (a query parameter can be empty for instance), but what
about (written as a JSON Object):

{
    "foo": "",
    "": "bar"
}

?

--
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
JSON Schema in Java: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com