Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for November 2011

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 30 November 2011 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6602311E80C0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:20:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sVlbv6K1bX0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5860D11E80AF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAULKeeQ027964 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:20:49 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1322688051; bh=3MbuQPqyih/kLqNeeg5AcoJTSUo=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XRAkVZE1SMlhxVwh+nhSC62bcI9ZbpB+VZRt91gA4SUrw+jzFcAmpMe7QCM3re8ao xQh6AedEEJL794PsMisQChOngInmo8exg5GM4rPISGKPTBN8UV9S/TqOCFeYZJiu6P KKZpyoKQziFPN9a0R165SoM5pxfSzXeQN1oDY1Jw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111130124511.09e20708@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:03:10 -0800
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED67B02.8000903@qualcomm.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111129224036.0acba060@elandnews.com> <4ED67B02.8000903@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for November 2011
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:20:57 -0000

At 10:50 30-11-2011, Pete Resnick wrote:
>Just to clarify: Though we are shutting down the review team, we are 
>reconstituting as an Apps Directorate. Reviews are not going away.

Please note that the reviews will still be semi-formal.

I would like to get some feedback from authors and other subscribers 
about the previous reviews.  Please send me your comments 
off-list.  I would like to know what you didn't like, what could be 
improved, etc.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy