Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-03.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6334A21F9671 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.179, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcHKjuQVG+0l for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A7721F966F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21876 invoked from network); 20 May 2013 17:32:58 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 20 May 2013 17:32:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=519a5e4a.xn--9vv.k1305; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=QRiwSOfZ3LwJp+bpj6VsKLM37wmnzi0FCziyzJbx0rI=; b=blOkZzMLFjTPuSvV6M2QY9tBijh4iST7voK1GZ3Nv8wPQIZDMnNYFYm4Dwbiryx/JgZX5Ge8jjTrSTRhc83b5AuA5ITMZhto1VQzY/jz/Li+Pqy4dp8CDIhkyPiZ4FuaoFPXTVSMmNhRjnfTi8TF53MuXqVf5NqLfeU7Rr4i/88=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=519a5e4a.xn--9vv.k1305; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=QRiwSOfZ3LwJp+bpj6VsKLM37wmnzi0FCziyzJbx0rI=; b=pim9l08T4OWupS22R8BqQzDtz7U8lhMe9lhPdMAG/GotioB2MyXjs0wFlaJqemF+4MIb4189Vq+Fnq1FVQzEKLWHlWsa/MRQ/voTDnbK0mw09jeE6baoyWsEsUkhcW4zlMJxUznLrGQc6z5C/qAqzZkzDZ2NY0ylSR8eHndFHA4=
Date: 20 May 2013 17:32:36 -0000
Message-ID: <20130520173236.69335.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwam9j89iAK2nahYkdmauUB--1yYo_+Mdp_WpDxLbBU9vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:33:04 -0000

>This incorporates the last of the WGLC feedback, including reverting the
>ABNF change that introduced a backward compatibility issue.

I'm confused. The -04 draft still says:

authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
              [ [CFWS] "/" [CFWS] version ]
              ( [CFWS] ";" [CFWS] "none" / 1*resinfo ) [CFWS] CRLF

The slash is still there and the CFWS before it is still optional.
Was there some other compatibility issue?