Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 22 March 2011 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D4C3A67DB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.573, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQijpIbjydxo for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:4870:a30c:41::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E693A67D9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.150] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2MMJGnp090300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:19:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D890230.4010308@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:19:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D1DDE0C9-8E58-4436-B02C-52C8856DDBDF@vpnc.org>
References: <4D87612E.3090900@dcrocker.net> <4D881C04.2080406@qualcomm.com> <4D882781.8020605@dcrocker.net> <4D890230.4010308@thinkingcat.com>
To: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF technical plenary: the end of application protocols
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:17:45 -0000

I note that all of the messages on this thread have gone to apps-discuss only, not to iab@ietf.org. I propose that if those with strong feelings about the topic description want to see it addressed sooner rather than later, talking to the IAB at the same time as the Apps Area might be more effective.

--Paul Hoffman