Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Wed, 02 November 2011 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <GK@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61741F0CA4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFd3AvUqGcVv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D221F0CA2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1RLXaX-0005TE-3B; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:58:29 +0000
Received: from client-7-201.eduroam.oxuni.org.uk ([192.76.7.201] helo=Eskarina.local) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1RLXaX-0002Zt-9K; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:58:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4EB11346.3010609@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:54:14 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
References: <1320187375.2622.25.camel@neutron>
In-Reply-To: <1320187375.2622.25.camel@neutron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:58:31 -0000

I'm in favour of this.

I'd be interested to hear if anyone has done any implementation work to use this 
to apply deltas to RDF data expressed using JSON (such as JSON-LD - 
http://json-ld.org/) - I'm guessing it should be a pretty good fit, but there 
may be devil in the detail.

#g
--=

On 01/11/2011 22:42, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> I have published and have been maintaining a JSON Patch Internet-Draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-json-patch-02
>
> There's now at least three actively maintained implementations in as
> many programming languages. Interest has been expressed in moving this
> toward an RFC. I've discussed this briefly with Mark Nottingham, Pete
> Resnick and Peter Saint-Andre, and consensus seems to be to raise this
> with APPSAWG and see if there's any interest in developing this on a
> standards track.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss