Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 30 April 2013 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E32621F9B8F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.494, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pW6zOiQ-ZRSq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996E921F9B8C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.190.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB66B509B5; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:59:53 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F922078B-323B-4956-A932-E620CC5120AB@mnot.net>
References: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted M. Young [@jitterted] <tedyoung@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 01:00:06 -0000

On 30/04/2013, at 8:36 AM, Ted M. Young [@jitterted] <tedyoung@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see that this draft has expired. Is there an -03 coming up (I see it in your github)? We're implementing it in a RESTful experiment and it'd be nice if it were still considered active (not that expiration would stop us for this experiment).

Oh, it's still active, just a slow burner. Once we get HTTP/1.1 to bed, i'll be spending some more time on it.


> Also, I've been trying to find if there's been discussion around the name of the media type, i.e., /json-home vs. /home+json. I don't want to beat a dead horse if this has already been discussed and the reasons explained.

I think it's likely the media type will change at some point, as we'll probably be making breaking changes before it's done.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/