Re: [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON HOme Documents
algermissen1971 <algermissen1971@me.com> Wed, 20 March 2013 07:01 UTC
Return-Path: <algermissen1971@me.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9422021F8B74 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWePeS2Tp5y1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com (nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com [17.158.232.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C10C21F8BF6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] ([80.187.102.26]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul 13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MJY00L9R656MD60@nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:01:40 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-20_03:2013-03-19, 2013-03-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1302030000 definitions=main-1303190313
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: algermissen1971 <algermissen1971@me.com>
In-reply-to: <CABP7Rbd-ss0jt-X8+PH=vN=RCoAPe_8qkjGf3Wc1N49G8KMBcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:01:39 +0100
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <FB92D00E-BBCA-46FE-B0BF-893A008F9D1B@me.com>
References: <1AD639E1-35D3-4F17-8C4C-FFD2CC2CAE5C@me.com> <DBDD85BF-7CF5-47F2-AC93-44A14FED51FF@mnot.net> <CABP7Rbd-ss0jt-X8+PH=vN=RCoAPe_8qkjGf3Wc1N49G8KMBcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:46:08 -0700
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON HOme Documents
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:01:44 -0000
On 20.03.2013, at 03:05, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> This variation looks to be the most useful.
+1
Just did not want to be too destructive on Marks' original design :-)
Jan
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> That'd be one way to do it. However, I suspect we're eventually going to want to put more information about representations in, so it could be metadata, e.g.,
>
> "hints": {
> "representations": {
> "application/widgetlist": {
> "deprecated": true
> },
> "application/special-new-widgetlist": {
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
- [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON HOme… Jan Algermissen
- [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON HOme… algermissen1971
- Re: [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON … James M Snell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Deprecation mechanism in JSON … algermissen1971