IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FYI: new draft of site-meta; now well-known

Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> Mon, 13 July 2009 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <samj@samj.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DA828C251 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YDigFA3FN6jE for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu1sys200aog114.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog114.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 51EB028C28C for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([209.85.220.216]) by eu1sys200aob114.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKSlr5JEQ4Q1NHC5z302QfyWTt5PzXZ7r5@postini.com; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:06:46 UTC
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so34134fxm.36 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.86.31.17 with SMTP id e17mr3058889fge.47.1247476004715; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8678C394-3BA6-4603-9981-D26256CE7A9C@mnot.net>
References: <A89DB2C2-1A29-4680-AE41-CCC749132631@mnot.net> <20090713072456.GA12378@x27.adm.denic.de> <8678C394-3BA6-4603-9981-D26256CE7A9C@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:06:44 +0200
Message-ID: <21606dcf0907130206h295cc849nfb8bbcdab076b843@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: new draft of site-meta; now well-known
From: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd24442207eaf046e92a4d2"
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:06:16 -0000

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Using a form with multiple dashes is much more likely to cause problems,
> IMO.
>

Agreed... I think /.well-known/ is highly sensible - kudos to whoever came
up with that (the former suggestions were, in contrast, very ordinary).

Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email