IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 26 October 2011 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F7921F8AFB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gf8AUQTqGkUW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0936C21F8AF5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9Q5nqbd018764 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1319608203; bh=ZjQ0cuupQ8zhgrER4muNMsi2Dz8obsF40TYV71ESKaA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=ViE6lBP1QD26AOl9WL4VORpkCp0pttZ0CPaWV4Ql2hQlnFW0AnGkSFIVRz9IONBmG 6WvU7JoRKq772N9M3RJhQvXEbdRzCuqWFpSBVXow7LCh0ChSMcAZzoSFqodq17OHg8 doRQGPLBcZqacGIRuIap2Z8DAYvPUIIBz4x7ZqOc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1319608203; bh=ZjQ0cuupQ8zhgrER4muNMsi2Dz8obsF40TYV71ESKaA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=tyjmWEr/aWRzvvuH34pPZfvOarg0A80YklblElu3Ccy9oLPjF2CEIksJI/64+J1JQ HavdUbTR+blHoUNBzFcbzLY6zCMIIn47m2wxacfIFnxA952Qf2PtILxovqIJrVfNvC zEzmzrjh+QLE3os5JNhrrOwIUEo0Ycpg4Zra6T0k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111025222554.09564380@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:34:54 -0700
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EA6E9E2.2080308@qualcomm.com>
References: <20111018191615.13760.71231.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADBvc98iHh4Nk4S0ipkSs3ATKTVBM_qALM9gGApj5gaW27t4nQ@mail.gmail.com> <01O7EEVR67JU00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14B3F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EA6E9E2.2080308@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:50:12 -0000

At 09:54 25-10-2011, Pete Resnick wrote:
>The IESG is of the opinion that this should go for the new "Internet 
>Standard" designation. That means running a new, 4-week, last call. 
>I will initiate that tomorrow unless I hear yelps of horror from the 
>WG. If I do hear such yelps, you had better give me an argument to 
>bring back to the IESG that I can defend.

I am not opposed to the above.

What happens to the RFC 5337 update?

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email