IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7830721F8575 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTCulJB2BzMs for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9074921F8572 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 572a58f4.0.1115370.00-275.3087673.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 4f85a2750c5a2e13-72d1a4c9daeaf7074002a98bbe310c26ca17c8e2
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3BFPeFV019567 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:41 -0400
Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3BFPcbT019563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:38 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:19 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BFPJjJ011045 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:19 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BFPBQE010787 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:11 -0400
Received: from [135.91.110.244] (ds135-91-110-244.dhcps.ugn.att.com[135.91.110.244]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120411152212gw1004or7te> (Authid: tony); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:22:12 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.91.110.244]
Message-ID: <4F85A256.3000400@att.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:10 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20120329204732.13711.266.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5580A282-E191-4962-9410-6CF9FB14EDFC@sensinode.com> <0885CE0D-11A3-4396-9443-37B4FF8D36C9@mnot.net> <201204020745.q327j8Rr014728@toshiba.co.jp> <A39CB179-C9AB-4B29-B775-25098F574223@mnot.net> <019201cd10e8$31dfa590$959ef0b0$@packetizer.com>
In-Reply-To: <019201cd10e8$31dfa590$959ef0b0$@packetizer.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=p4QNoMogDYAA:10 a=vnNYxAp2wzwA:10 a=I33QWX3c-g]
X-AnalysisOut: [EA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:1]
X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a=Aw8TyfFb4e4_T-A0z3kA:9 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=3z2xXJCcnt5ZCepL1g0A:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10]
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:25:42 -0000

On 4/2/2012 11:49 AM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> I've noted that nearly every time that JSON is employed the associated media type is application/json.  In fact, I cannot recall having seen any standards with application/whatever+json.  So, does this suggest that the level of granularity is not needed?

The following have all been registered:
     vnd.collection+json
     vnd.hal+json
     vnd.oftn.l10n+json


     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email