Re: [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area Working Group (appsawg)
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 18 November 2010 03:26 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77F73A635F for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:26:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxmzLA194VDz for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1F3A63D3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (ip-216-17-182-51.rev.frii.com [216.17.182.51]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B86DC40BB9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:37:03 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CE49D06.8090204@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:27:02 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20101026185224.E5A1E3A6877@core3.amsl.com> <00f101cb859e$d166e6e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <AANLkTikfGWF6rgLRo8zQZF84yJiaNGW6abiHdz3+OfaG@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikfGWF6rgLRo8zQZF84yJiaNGW6abiHdz3+OfaG@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms050909050804060207010508"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area Working Group (appsawg)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:26:22 -0000
On 11/17/10 8:25 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> Doh! it's apps-discuss, of course, which I have been on for years, but ... what >> then is the difference between appsawg and apps-discuss? same mailing list, >> same archives, same recipients, same messages, same posters, .... > > I thought we'd explained that adequately. It's exactly *because* > people are already here that we want to keep the discussions here. > The structure of a working group is a process thing, which need not > affect the way people already discuss applications-area issues and > review documents for apps-related things. +1
- [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area Worki… IESG Secretary
- Re: [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area W… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area W… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] WG Action: Applications Area W… Peter Saint-Andre