IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kerwin-file-scheme

Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Sat, 20 December 2014 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7461A8ADC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dzxz7JHkurGG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4411A1B30 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM2PR0201MB0958.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.216.26) by DM2PR0201MB1006.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.219.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.31.17; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:55:36 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.216.28) by DM2PR0201MB0958.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.216.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.31.17; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:55:31 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.216.28]) by DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.216.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0049.002; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:55:31 +0000
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kerwin-file-scheme
Thread-Index: AQHQGhfIlOWNfZCYG0u4zhqMmswUzpyY0uCg
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:55:30 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR0201MB09604DBCC319F62A89FBA3B5C3680@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYrAGk-gpfMKigy8C8CCzdA4NhQv60UdUmBtXdkQF10SA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYrAGk-gpfMKigy8C8CCzdA4NhQv60UdUmBtXdkQF10SA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2601:9:8380:992:3d03:3e2:8556:a1d5]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=masinter@adobe.com;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0201MB0958;UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0201MB0958;
x-forefront-prvs: 0431F981D8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(107886001)(54206007)(106356001)(105586002)(4396001)(87936001)(21056001)(120916001)(101416001)(33656002)(62966003)(107046002)(2900100001)(2656002)(19580395003)(99396003)(31966008)(76576001)(68736005)(77156002)(122556002)(54356999)(99286002)(40100003)(76176999)(46102003)(74316001)(64706001)(92566001)(230783001)(15975445007)(102836002)(97736003)(20776003)(106116001)(50986999)(86362001)(54606007)(2950100001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0201MB0958; H:DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0201MB1006;
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/n1hQrbf3r79PXMOjPyDawXitIGk
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kerwin-file-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:55:39 -0000

> This opens a call for adoption for draft-kerwin-file-scheme, to be processed by APPSAWG.  

I don't think apps area should take up kerwin-file-scheme as an independent work item, not because the work isn't important but because apps-discuss is too congested to manage the discussion (no responses to my Dec 9 comments https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg13462.html ). In general, APPSAWG shouldn't take up URL-scheme permanent registrations? Or should it? This should be addressed in the scheme registration BCP.

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status