[apps-discuss] Comparisons in the CBOR draft
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 27 May 2013 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553F821F96A7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlXZtOuYJk60 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CD021F969C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4RGVZKV081987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <790FBA26-527F-4244-BB82-C5759F1E8FC3@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 09:31:34 -0700
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [apps-discuss] Comparisons in the CBOR draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:31:37 -0000
Greetings again. Based on the requests here last week, we will be adding a section to the CBOR draft briefly discussing some major existing formats with respect to their major properties and the design goals for CBOR. We already have sections for ASN.1 DER/BER, MessagePack, and BSON. Are there other formats people would like to see in the list? What are people's favorite streaming-capable JSON-like binary formats? --Paul Hoffman
- [apps-discuss] Comparisons in the CBOR draft Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comparisons in the CBOR draft James M Snell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comparisons in the CBOR draft Dave Crocker