Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 27 June 2012 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDAD21F85A2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMtijMjJY5gH for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CB821F8514 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5R91U3o011316; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1340787696; bh=8wwC2TtyG+Cey/FXZ4PuZaqj1X6zAs56X/RKLdOO4KE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=0Q5x3f6lzptewoQso8tWMTEWw3GG5Qfl8aGgtmu5PE1vxi8mJLBfv+txfGFIWkELk fKmxZIAkGfeQS6QLoOFAIk2blj10NRBZcQER1dnOJSMvY8W4uiO2gfQwcDZ+xRnrwy UV1r45OxJ1YtCtDlMrqZKmMcltlu1ffRVTr+hSLQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1340787696; i=@resistor.net; bh=8wwC2TtyG+Cey/FXZ4PuZaqj1X6zAs56X/RKLdOO4KE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=M7xoPh691R0iu6N2KcPnnF9CuGIfKwmRyEcR1XPI82LFkyz0RraeVej6zw7VURx0R woiqGUsePAf8zWWo1PdD3gpeBGLYXW4RAuCnX0EdJico6cJKRl60arTwKt+9LPGQxx 9TeKFCYoaNaR6GKC3Es0k4eD+U9PtB8MV9VsRPxg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120627012228.0a8b4298@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:56:27 -0700
To: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FEAB98E.307@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAKaEYhKpeayOw4sN4=NYaoXKJQ2e5P+pP8SqJqnt-=Barb=WqA@mail.gmail.com> <4FEA6677.3020705@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <6.2.5.6.2.20120626224534.0a8b4298@resistor.net> <4FEAB98E.307@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:01:42 -0000

Hi Martin,
At 00:43 27-06-2012, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>I can't disagree with what you say, but I'm not 
>sure whether you agree or disagree with what I said. Can you clarify?

I think that what you said makes sense.  I don't 
like the override as it is difficult to explain 
that to someone who views Expert review as a 
barrier he or she should not jump over twice.

Regards,
-sm