Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON patch: "test" operation

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 29 December 2011 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8917E21F8B61 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:15:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.440, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xXxbbb3T9RJv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 192B121F8A70 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2011 21:15:40 -0000
Received: from p3EE2751C.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [62.226.117.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2011 22:15:40 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19QD2l4i0dQ47LYKc3lD0FmH2rMw440sW5/2LlvEQ x2QIHHsLvOEtMd
Message-ID: <4EFCD872.6070209@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:15:30 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
References: <4ED64A26.5030003@gmx.de> <BC564D94-6D00-4D63-863A-8AAD00E57B3A@tzi.org> <4ED77513.3070506@gmx.de> <6E443D75-D1AC-451F-9B17-115C9A6C7696@mnot.net> <4ED7F8C2.9030804@gmx.de> <37E09A53-E9F4-45D2-BB8F-79655BECDBB2@mnot.net> <1322779521.1958.1.camel@neutron> <4EFC8A08.7000105@gmx.de> <CAKTR039w=bDjsdGvJZagkNDN_8fSyKo-hj6-qCbWMBj7sLkEnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKTR039w=bDjsdGvJZagkNDN_8fSyKo-hj6-qCbWMBj7sLkEnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON patch: "test" operation
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:15:43 -0000

On 2011-12-29 18:48, Sam Johnston wrote:
> Julian,
>
> 1) The "commit" message sounds like a job for a header, but rather than
> define one I'd suggest using a generic one for all such applications —
> I've been using an "Attribute:" header for my semantic HTTP work (e.g.
> Attribute: title="Picture of man biting dog").

This might work; but of course that needs to be defined as well...

> 2) For MOVE & COPY I've been using WebDAV methods (sans XML).

Understood. But may not be the right thing for everybody...