IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F237721F85D3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gHbwwzvsO9m1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6596A21F85D2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id ygpM1i0010ZaKgw01gpMn4; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:49:21 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=CMKorGXD c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=4zWJvGiJOd0A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=9NGZVl_YAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=t1nnKUNFtySeYt2VX-kA:9 a=0qLjg1Qp34bHUJhMPWsA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=I9DA3x22SqsA:10 a=69XIa8IdTDMA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:49:21 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
Thread-Index: AQHNG+r80LIQF+Mfl0iD33houG6N4ZadqYbw
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:49:20 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280F37B9@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4F877CEE.5030107@arcanedomain.com> <01OE8S1I9Z2K00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280EF063@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CA8E55D5-822A-47DC-B5CB-583CC328227B@jenitennison.com> <4F87EBD4.90501@gmx.de> <CFA00AEC-F80B-4517-8101-A5DDA57555ED@jenitennison.com> <01OEABGEZ8RU00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F8C43AC.10005@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4F8C43AC.10005@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1334594961; bh=WaeeqaFFUFBqfKCwAmMMSLBl/y4x1w33/XCs6PtCjvw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=JVyOF1cMX/NiwywrbkSnqRzLuF6it+mNrNnYtgZa0V+V10ICq3xpmqiU6V+qUDVI7 M0x+yn5pT7WfOhrjJgCBjyMjn2KqNHv7+919sWQZ0ELE/R3rGopiD5gcR5HjuP8HWH RDivsQCU1EHP00sBIo9HMnham9guXwYGwv+m1RWo=
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:49:23 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:07 AM
> To: Ned Freed
> Cc: Jeni Tennison; apps-discuss@ietf.org;
> tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com; Julian Reschke; Noah Mendelsohn;
> john+ietf@jck.com; www-tag@w3.org List
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type
> Specifications and Registration Procedures
> 
> > If you want to put this stuff in an RFC, it needs to one that's on the
> > regular standards track. And that means it needs to be in a different
> > document. All you can put in this document are the registration rules
> > for specifying a fragment identifier. Nothing more.
> 
> Ned is right: this document defines best practices for *registering*
> media types. We all might want to more clearly specify the syntax and
> semantics of fragment identifiers, but IMHO that's out of scope for the
> registration procedures per se.

I think I agree.  Would it be an appropriate path forward to put that into another document, and then reference that one from this one as an Informative?

-MSK, as participant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email