Return-Path: X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F55D28C149; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:35:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.023 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.023 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vzda8lBQoZef; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5143C28C146; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by gwj17 with SMTP id 17so548361gwj.31 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:36:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; bh=j88SIsBvYDxAhxE6MvNxx6exD0XGu/DL4AbukOwXZBw=; b=j6dfofiRaZaUhBzWZFZhi1QcavydCs0TqEzz/0QLFP59j5qyKs4DS7Y5AlPZnoSKUn NDJslD6l8yoI4anbNrGbx7j6SBeogYuoduVQck8E/c1zMQPWIHaq7v0tcBiqbevpn8vp K163LiUvAP2hWJSJzPdg5W6eq0r87m/EyXyRY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; b=S6/994EguBpjU+E/YPNS01+Xp/CyBix1NFkCCcMjMW4Pn2NK3Lu0hsvsEwHR3CC3Bz bPrVAHo+giNcklJB3Y0wR/2DpqCNx+xRMptgYNwq6vX0GbhrcvZXB8nE3qD4gIIMUTSr RLosZTHgDBonQUJMnTgj0bygRuQ5uFzOxWOrg= Received: by 10.204.76.207 with SMTP id d15mr798841bkk.198.1290699359580; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm416415bkj.4.2010.11.25.07.35.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:35:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CEE8263.9030303@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:36:03 +0200 From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: uri-review@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050004060508020609030008" Subject: [apps-discuss] tn3270 URI scheme formal specification X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:35:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050004060508020609030008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello all, There has been a discussion about tn3270 URI scheme on the lists recently. The consensus was that we need a formal specification of the scheme. I've made an I-D on this topic - you are able to find it here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri/ Feedbacks and suggestions are welcome. All the best, Mykyta Yevstifeyev --------------050004060508020609030008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello all,

There has been a discussion about tn3270 URI scheme
on the lists recently. The consensus was that we need
a formal specification of the scheme. I've made an I-D
on this topic - you are able to find it here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri/

Feedbacks and suggestions are welcome.

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
 --------------050004060508020609030008--