IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Thu, 05 April 2012 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E3A11E80C5; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Siy5c9Raq2v; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1498F11E80AB; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 8251d7f4.0.1437362.00-304.3989042.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 4f7d15295a4bae63-bffd7e3e2735bfdfba63c48424556a8580fccefc
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q353idON031759; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:44:40 -0400
Received: from sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (sflint01.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.228]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q353iX3n031739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:44:34 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:44:21 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q353iKu1004119; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:44:20 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q353iECe003957; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:44:16 -0400
Received: from [135.70.50.134] (vpn-135-70-50-134.vpn.west.att.com[135.70.50.134]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120405034118gw1004orv7e> (Authid: tony); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 03:41:19 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.50.134]
Message-ID: <4F7D150B.1000604@att.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:44:11 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "domainrep@ietf.org" <domainrep@ietf.org>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C8BC0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F7C4851.4070405@att.com> <4F7C5471.8030309@bbiw.net> <4F7CCC06.7030503@att.com> <orkpn75ms2n5gb8en848unh8uls41er3i6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <orkpn75ms2n5gb8en848unh8uls41er3i6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=mW1RiBFPTJEA:10 a=vnNYxAp2wzwA:10 a=WtyMWy3etK]
X-AnalysisOut: [IA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:1]
X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=aHbQn7i]
X-AnalysisOut: [Ur0rU4xo5ydYA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=GD-vvujBj0gA:10 a=2i86]
X-AnalysisOut: [k7FQ2MBY2oPB:21]
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [domainrep] XML vs. JSON examples
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:44:42 -0000

Hmmm, interesting. Even though I'm a co-author on that doc, I forgot 
about that particular tidbit in it. :-)

I still think it's worth separating out the registration of these 
suffixes and making them explicit.

     Tony Hansen

On 4/4/2012 7:06 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Tony Hansen wrote:
>> Although draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs both mentions the use of
>> +json and defines a registry that can be used to register it, and
>> despite +json being used already in a variety of registered media types,
>> +json hasn't been formally defined yet.
>>
>> So, I posted draft-hansen-media-type-suffix-regs-00 for consideration to
>> fill in this hole.
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04304.html

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status