Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 10 November 2011 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D6521F849D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:11:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.923, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfTAHkmwcq78 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 27FC321F844C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2011 08:11:48 -0000
Received: from p5DCC32E8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.204.50.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 10 Nov 2011 09:11:48 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ktXw687okFR/App5AXHpwjAUr99W68BVhGycSYk zk0ctbHLnSIySm
Message-ID: <4EBB873D.4020107@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:11:41 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst=22?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <24FBF40353ABCC3A4F15E82B@PST.JCK.COM> <56B202FE-ED81-4C36-AB4C-0A809F51D009@standardstrack.com> <4EBB3762.6000907@dcrocker.net> <4EBB7568.1020003@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EBB7568.1020003@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:11:58 -0000

On 2011-11-10 07:55, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> I think it may be too early to discuss procedural points, but we are
> speaking about one, potentially two, drafts, both of which quite short.
> In the old days, AD-sponsored individual submission(s) would have been
> best. Now, we might need to move it through the Apps WG.
>
> Trying to do anything like a BOF or a WG seems complete overkill. There
> are many people involved in fonts (in particular Web fonts). But I can't
> imagine them shell out the money just to come to an IETF meeting for
> getting a few types registered.
>
> This is not about a spec for a new protocol or format. The formats
> exist, some of them for more than 10 years, some of them more recent.
> It's just about giving them labels.
>
> Regards, Martin.

++++++1

Best regards, Julian