Re: [apps-discuss] Revised DMARC working group charter proposal

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 4/15/2013 8:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 15, 2013 08:36:20 PM Dave Crocker wrote:
>> That's the same as saying that when one starts a negotiation, one is
>> obligated to make a contract.
...
> In this case it's more like announcing a lockout when the initial offer from
> management isn't accepted without modification by the union rather than
> determining a meeting of the minds cannot be achieved after good faith
> negotiations.
>
> 1.  How about this?
> 2.  Not quite, here are some alternatives we could discuss.
> 1.  I quit.
>
> that's hardly a negotiation.


1. The exchange was more elaborate than that, including clarification 
for the reasons of the charter draft(s) that have been offered.  In 
addition, please note that the counter-proposal has not justified its 
position and, in fact, has been offered with complete rigidity, up to 
today, and hasn't responded to the concerns raised with it.

2. The lockout imagine is striking and entirely inapplicable, since 
there is no pre-existing relationship, nevermind an employer/employee one.

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net