Re: [apps-discuss] Reserved URI query parameter in draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Sat, 14 April 2012 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2174721F85B1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCDx6mV6f3bW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B80621F85AE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so6649245dad.27 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=U5tZ9G1+/oEnkXzmG+IxMxrQR3TIqkb9uY9ClK0zN9g=; b=fPo3Ft9cENkGzRyEJPn1S3Sgn5ViaUDfHEH06UBKA2kxJThVHDRZQivMgbFWVstJFK dLBR1j0RIiV+kv8K1AwNChn3XxrzNBhH/ho3Y8VDhrUVmLotzNc3Nyn3qKkWVTBdIJ5F ojDH5VBpwlsTaklWbeMUht6qZl/Gi6ZuyXaODWDaB7wTOFRWnEgO5SES/hoZzS5eRR7P NAe67/XDRSFagMT1701gNeyzGXGkks1EvVzm47KakE827LC4x1xdoQJ60cJNimM4Hqfn LH2gbSUBybc2olivJ+XG1uuh6zlvDFHgK35iTS2V/MZ7UaWdZHSpWE68wwP1nF6QTb87 Wutw==
Received: by 10.68.201.169 with SMTP id kb9mr10671361pbc.146.1334389420016; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.91] (c-24-5-69-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.69.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7sm11060545pbr.3.2012.04.14.00.43.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5EAD21E3-7725-4CC3-8CB9-0B8466EDA115"
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OEACFVDL5O00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:36 -0700
Message-Id: <E88A83EE-1212-4747-BFE4-F147B49EE088@gmail.com>
References: <4F866AC0.3000603@qualcomm.com> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FE2816@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <CAHBU6iuR+2CfPsPdkjMJCSmzrX1B8_nLB=xp_NRZi7db78V8vw@mail.gmail.com> <EA3F224E-B219-4753-8D6D-27A1BDDF97FB@tzi.org> <01OEACFVDL5O00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:04:41 -0700
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, "draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.all@tools.ietf.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Reserved URI query parameter in draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:44:10 -0000

On Apr 13, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
> 
> That said, the rules are what they are, and comparison of URIs has to be taken
> into account.

What is the URI comparison rule you are referring to? 

-- Dick