Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC0021F9057 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fpxmMtotg00 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5514921F9054 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m15so1238354wgh.29 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iatbrOYHgGOfAW0HSkxTYq3ZRZ9mWr23m5vN4fTubfs=; b=LX80RPBW0PuNZlX79pC2V8An81Px9mBDw63JsyIr32YlWXYfkqNe7rUKwP8kliXsoK AcHw0GKjR4MdZQKkb8YXD7KTyj2DJV04OEmmTbP0FfEZM2kJ+pulsNXqMk8HLLMToo4f C02vwqsRQW7Hh/O0VxjsAInuJ8uqyb5qBT5Hj/ai5igy8yq7l9fI/Vea8Yw1q/8agdm/ O2BL0lNtnY7j6fkm0CBZBl/DmVifd7vFbwpQxp88Y5IxfZCR9zczWGwvBGblWHdjPiq/ 7nmmpRsOLz5s6k1JixrjOl95pCapgd0gp1QOZUSst+lazpNDpXuv0WBSVX7WMj2y+4Ys 65Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.109 with SMTP id x13mr15674948wij.20.1367966614310; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.14.34 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:43:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaSKK+WxszAiGLp1yqe9ixWN9gH8OzysToAY3GKuWerFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f6473f51c59cd04dc288c24"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:43:38 -0000

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>wrote:

> We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
> since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document and
> appears to fall within our charter.
>
> We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
> through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
> adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
> currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
> constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?
>
>
I should add that the person submitting the request was not the author and
has volunteered to shepherd the document, so add one to whatever count
comes out of this thread.  :-)