Re: [apps-discuss] Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Wed, 08 June 2011 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E321F8546; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3Qdxm2d1n-B; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA76D21F8526; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1307553124; x=1339089124; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4DEFAD27.1070701@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20We d,=208=20Jun=202011=2012:11:03=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Res nick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Jiankang=20YAO=20<yaojk@cnnic. cn>|CC:=20IETF-Discussion=20list=20<ietf@ietf.org>,=20<ap psawg-ads@tools.ietf.org>,=0D=0A=09<apps-discuss@ietf.org >|Subject:=20Re:=20Summary=20for=20IESG=20last=20call=20t o=205892bis=20draft|References:=20<FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF 16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>|In-Reply-To:=20<FFB4A22E53204E 7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>|Content-Type:=20text/p lain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1 72.30.48.1]; bh=aB8qEwTHYfUu7F1i2dB55ZYUz7ccKNUyEfQoELPtK+M=; b=DtCcBkw5iOb9vGj3x1+wjawlk4JVsvEjiMLo4eo7Vt30GLbyk2+hxkT6 xqnMSsQ7ihKkWzxWFsMAd+uxCLkpCmbA/DaH5KEAVCdsn+03Xdfw76GYl jrW+tYpL0CG68uEXnkjT5YgNZcFMGOBcyNiJX5cmsLcl7CtbnVkObipTx U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6370"; a="96232796"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,339,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="143323448"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:11:05 -0700
Message-ID: <4DEFAD27.1070701@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:11:03 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
References: <FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>
In-Reply-To: <FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, appsawg-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:12:05 -0000

Well, a little miscommunication; I had meant to send the summary to the 
APPSAWG where the document was discussed, but sending it to the IETF 
list is OK too. Since it's here, one comment:

On 6/8/11 2:04 AM, Jiankang YAO wrote:
> ----------------------------
> issue4: Add the IANA IDNA registry or replace the old one?
> [...]
> *****We are waiting for John and Paul reaching the agreement about this issue*******
>    

I think we have gotten agreement from folks (including but not limited 
to doc authors and ADs involved in the conversation) that we'll go ahead 
with this document and write a quick new document clarifying that what 
5892 meant was that IANA should *add* a new table to the registry and 
(with the older one) label it as to from which version of Unicode the 
table was generated.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102