Re: [apps-discuss] Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft

Pete Resnick <> Wed, 08 June 2011 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E321F8546; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.391
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3Qdxm2d1n-B; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA76D21F8526; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;;; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1307553124; x=1339089124; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<>|Date:=20We d,=208=20Jun=202011=2012:11:03=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Res nick=20<>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv: |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Jiankang=20YAO=20<yaojk@cnnic. cn>|CC:=20IETF-Discussion=20list=20<>,=20<ap>,=0D=0A=09< >|Subject:=20Re:=20Summary=20for=20IESG=20last=20call=20t o=205892bis=20draft|References:=20<FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF 16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>|In-Reply-To:=20<FFB4A22E53204E 7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>|Content-Type:=20text/p lain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1]; bh=aB8qEwTHYfUu7F1i2dB55ZYUz7ccKNUyEfQoELPtK+M=; b=DtCcBkw5iOb9vGj3x1+wjawlk4JVsvEjiMLo4eo7Vt30GLbyk2+hxkT6 xqnMSsQ7ihKkWzxWFsMAd+uxCLkpCmbA/DaH5KEAVCdsn+03Xdfw76GYl jrW+tYpL0CG68uEXnkjT5YgNZcFMGOBcyNiJX5cmsLcl7CtbnVkObipTx U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6370"; a="96232796"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,339,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="143323448"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Jun 2011 10:12:04 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:11:05 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:11:03 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiankang YAO <>
References: <FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>
In-Reply-To: <FFB4A22E53204E7E8DDACF16D2F5588D@LENOVO47E041CF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: []
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <>,,
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:12:05 -0000

Well, a little miscommunication; I had meant to send the summary to the 
APPSAWG where the document was discussed, but sending it to the IETF 
list is OK too. Since it's here, one comment:

On 6/8/11 2:04 AM, Jiankang YAO wrote:
> ----------------------------
> issue4: Add the IANA IDNA registry or replace the old one?
> [...]
> *****We are waiting for John and Paul reaching the agreement about this issue*******

I think we have gotten agreement from folks (including but not limited 
to doc authors and ADs involved in the conversation) that we'll go ahead 
with this document and write a quick new document clarifying that what 
5892 meant was that IANA should *add* a new table to the registry and 
(with the older one) label it as to from which version of Unicode the 
table was generated.


Pete Resnick<>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102