[apps-discuss] URITemplates and Atom
Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> Tue, 13 March 2012 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <williamstw@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718AE21F88E9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fj8R-p+bcTDK for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6E421F88CF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhpp34 with SMTP id p34so722313yhp.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Bp7ITSqmRC0rEL0g/p3FQr2odhM2VNrqac432wgX8II=; b=E/3SDEwbKnyhkLTbCt54qnXWOCJ9JuNpYS83NpcukDBKLKjfNI2u82u+rWu7WMADPX ImDANuNGxcIjdjBK9xMk9+eqj49XOQo536l0kWCUVM9u8j/yu7xL72MIOON02igyGwdM cOWISsHabRhZ9q9/HZ5YeahmFOM7zqrCUBka8Bonr4+nmNbHkY6tZA01YAtUSJRh+8yP Mx4N3TEI3AyArv+ZWMr3cTlF/l6x9Zcgd1ywF6MrDrK8aBjLd/4vtsXtm6TrPM2htvWE ex4tVWEIctxUbSMKT3KUBT8IlsPKvo29fjjE70FWv6f9VRVLfvxVQV5nbWd3Y1+OMStO FBVg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.37.99 with SMTP id x3mr12227948obj.31.1331649581270; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.209.97 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:39:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG_bHoytkZ12h4SOE57cokaJgmA8e+S-mZ4EWf-4mCBh4vnkFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [apps-discuss] URITemplates and Atom
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:39:54 -0000
I found that using URITemplates in Atom links has been discussed on another list[1] and concluded it's not appropriate. The consensus there seems to have been that a new I-D was needed - presumably to describe applying URITemplates to Atom. That discussion was some time ago, does anyone know of any activity around that? Thanks, --tim **please feel free to point me to a more appropriate list if there is one. [1] - http://old.nabble.com/URI-Templates-in-Atom-links-td27717625.html
- [apps-discuss] URITemplates and Atom Tim Williams