Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) Mon, 04 November 2013 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE95511E8227; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9CCs1mNCkoD8; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.16.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AE521E817C; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk (crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.33.180]) by treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id rA4FfOCh018829; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:41:29 GMT
Received: from troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk (troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.25.32]) by crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA4FfNbG001302; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:41:23 GMT
Received: from troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA4FfNEr006861; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:41:23 GMT
Received: (from ht@localhost) by troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id rA4FfMu5006857; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:41:22 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk: ht set sender to ht@inf.ed.ac.uk using -f
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131027115007.07e32210@elandnews.com> <526E8B9E.8030006@gmx.de> <6.2.5.6.2.20131029050405.0caf8b40@elandnews.com> <526FC24D.7060704@gmx.de> <6.2.5.6.2.20131030060359.0cb29068@elandnews.com> <B6CADE9A-2472-44B5-96E4-18B571D48CD6@mnot.net>
From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:41:22 +0000
In-Reply-To: <B6CADE9A-2472-44B5-96E4-18B571D48CD6@mnot.net> (Mark Nottingham's message of "Thu\, 31 Oct 2013 14\:31\:28 +1100")
Message-ID: <f5bmwlkgonx.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.101 (Gnus v5.10.10) XEmacs/21.5-b33 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at treacle.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 129.215.16.102
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics.all@tools.ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:45:13 -0000
Mark Nottingham writes: > Consensus around this text was particularly hard-won; unless there > is a very good reason to make a change, I'd rather not risk falling > into that rat-hole again. And, I should add in case it helps at all, that the W3C TAG was involved in the extensive discussions which resulted in this text. I also think the fact that it is where it is, in 3.1.1.5, does matter. But recapitulating and/or referencing it in the Security Considerations section would of course be fine, and indeed probably desireable. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpb… S Moonesamy
- [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review of d… Julian Reschke
- [apps-discuss] IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review o… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review … Julian Reschke
- [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of m… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review … John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review … John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review … Amos Jeffries
- Re: [apps-discuss] IANA issues, was: APPSDIR revi… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] IANA issues, was: APPSDIR revi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] obs-date, was: APPSDIR review … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Larry Masinter