Re: [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via something, maybe WebFinger

Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Wed, 10 February 2016 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016E51B2ECE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDHu_Yt8avi6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882861B2ECD for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id yy13so15974456pab.3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=TMWYVZh8bDsezGFciW8OkI7eo0VMTdiQITLLuHfQiE0=; b=pkEWx5Tod3Bj6HfJNOzSn8p60ea4YTmz7U6Ssd0vKprIZXFSdIqQ6K5xSDPKCeL59y K1sSQvwRIHL46D3fZcLJkpAwnJz/bOvL0yIHe7jHNUvgEtZ7UUvO8r9C4/toay0UGpiO P5xVmltSUHmfycoGonmpdKhcmCgAEfUZrw50pO/N+lIy/GmJc6rGpQHZ5tkFg/j4SOkU 8tnbeApa6VFuK91xyxdz/D/lTG/Q8XETyMu/WZN3LsGA9RZM5gMC3iutZOq6zK5YLzYd m/MZry+SgEWVbUre8k7+fdHGXF1SdbyY1A4ZYy+yiz0a8tzxi1hXXu5ioRwnh0MO5Q3y D9BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=TMWYVZh8bDsezGFciW8OkI7eo0VMTdiQITLLuHfQiE0=; b=EU6ZlAu5jsu41xlsDpPfSGhBZwT4yEGwKatYPzO+PWIVcG3T9she0Dv7s89DryJcyb 5R5Kk27J/nDIk5nSncdoPaRC9tq+UduwV/qHrFTPuLvSYanrqHNQJS4eiY2CYSymUr5a 0mhKBMr2IAzpPiv71mlX/7/EBeNHm1EkkYDWQNReRsdfZ+p82YyC22mxQmmh682Jb0mf t/PQMxHV0jiumewxN8dukRFRJav9BQ/TLrXRwRPsDSem0ExOGrauAr2NxUrpC3Bmmdgr gfSB/gdk5LG/ETNKtk+22ylPq3E0AXxeHbv4K1LTYyCGn+XgepbVSywIYHYUG8FSG7Lo pBUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORZ/2Nn0wIsad+HYRFrpApgxPc+ha1N9BOdbrV9yhBH4jSbBZ+Gxk/gHVa2wLNbfQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.150.170 with SMTP id uj10mr16568781pab.73.1455130624170; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (184-99-102-85.boid.qwest.net. [184.99.102.85]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm6876935pfo.58.2016.02.10.10.57.03 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:03 -0800 (PST)
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20160210181822.1369.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <56BB87FE.3070703@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:57:02 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160210181822.1369.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms070902040707050205000005"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/t8_grOLm8a7URslig8_0GFSSKQw>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via something, maybe WebFinger
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:57:06 -0000

On 02/10/2016 11:18 AM, John Levine wrote:
> ...
> 
> Yes, for the umpteenth time, RFC 6186 is not a 100% solution.  But it
> sure seems like a 95% solution to me.

I know, I just wanted to list the issues found over the last few years.


-- 

Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
DouglasRoyer@gmail.com
714-989-6135