Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 17 November 2011 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4C721F97A0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:17:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Inshiv4hwXnb for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F51421F979D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-1422.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [130.129.20.34]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2A79421AB; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:23:24 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EC4A6E0.6000503@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:17:04 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <20111117045856.117E6B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <B2896927-475F-41A7-8D87-336B672A4D9B@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B2896927-475F-41A7-8D87-336B672A4D9B@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:17:12 -0000

Good work. Congratulations to all involved.

On 11/17/11 2:16 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Of interest to folks here...
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Subject: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
>> Date: November 17, 2011 12:58:54 PM GMT+08:00
>> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
>> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>>
>>
>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>>
>>
>>        RFC 6449
>>
>>        Title:      Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations 
>>        Author:     J. Falk, Ed.
>>        Status:     Informational
>>        Stream:     IETF
>>        Date:       November 2011
>>        Mailbox:    ietf@cybernothing.org
>>        Pages:      31
>>        Characters: 75139
>>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>>
>>        I-D Tag:    draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-03.txt
>>
>>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6449.txt
>>
>> Complaint Feedback Loops similar to those described herein have
>> existed for more than a decade, resulting in many de facto standards
>> and best practices.  This document is an attempt to codify, and thus
>> clarify, the ways that both providers and consumers of these feedback
>> mechanisms intend to use the feedback, describing some already common
>> industry practices.
>>
>> This document is the result of cooperative efforts within the
>> Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group, a trade organization separate
>> from the IETF.  The original MAAWG document upon which this document
>> is based was published in April, 2010.  This document does not
>> represent the consensus of the IETF; rather it is being published as
>> an Informational RFC to make it widely available to the Internet
>> community and simplify reference to this material from IETF work.
>> This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
>> published for informational purposes.
>>
>>
>> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
>> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
>> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss